article
Pride, In the Name of
_____?
ken molnar
may 7, 2009
I don't think I am entirely
alone in this when I say: Pride was great, but what was it, really?
Now, before you go get all riled up and email me about the good
works all these community groups are doing (which I know they are),
just give a listen, read on. I know for a fact that I am not the
only one who, year after year, looks forward to going, but in a
weird generic "it'll be kinda fun, I guess, but I have to go, don't
I?" sort of way. In other words you show up, coffee in hand, meet
your friends, take some pics, crack some jokes, wander around a bit,
and go drink. Maybe you buy something, maybe you chat up that one
hot guy you haven't seen before. But, then ... ?
There's a little bit of an existential blankness there. Maybe it's
because we are actually succeeding. Maybe it's because gay marriage
is finally doing its domino-line tumble, thanks to the prolonged and
dedicated work of people I know like Stan and Joe. (We just got
Maine yesterday!) Maybe it's because we are all over the media now:
Ellen, Rosie, Melissa, k.d., Elton, Carson, Ryan Seacrest—oops,
sorry, not out yet! (Wait, here's a new gay mission: how about some
"out" hunky guys. Why do they always have to be scrawny and
comedic?)
Anyway, just the other day—bored at work—I happened to look up the
history of Newton Arvin. I had heard about this guy, the Smith
professor who was busted back in, like, the Pleistocene Era for merely being
gay. (Actually, they arrested him under the charge of possessing "pornographic" material, material that—to today's
eyes—looks ridiculously chaste, like a life-art model from a drawing
class.)
I understand that things were different then, but here was the fact
that stopped me in my tracks: Newton Arvin lived for, I think, 37
years in Northampton before being arrested in 1960 and all the
while he complained bitterly and often to his friends about how
conservative and narrow Northampton was. Northampton.
Well, I guess lots of places were conservative back then—this was
years before the hippies and Haight-Ashbury, after all—and I know
that since the 60s Northampton has certainly gone through it's decades-long slump, and
now its liberal "revival" (although now we are sliding dangerously into
the Overly Gentrified Zone ...
but that is another story for another day).
But the point is this. Arvin's one small statement made me see the
town as if I were wearing strange headachey 3-D glasses: out of one eye the prosecutory past, and out of the other the present-day pride :
the parade, the purple balloons, the rainbow flags, the lesbians and go-go boys
dancing around on floats, girls holding hands, two men
kissing—all
out on the street in the bright light of day. No fights, no
riots, no police, no hiding, no shame, no blame. The world does not
end. Everything is fine. We all seem to get along.
I think the reason I can't feel Pride anymore is because it's like
health: you only notice it if something isn't working. Pride then
becomes a necessary response to a world that would have you believe
that who you are is fundamentally wrong. So when the bullies back
off, you tend to put the big sticks away, 'cause you don't need them
anymore. (I could really say something
here.) But anyway, I wish Newton Arvin could
have seen what his "narrow, constricted" town has become. He
wouldn't have believed it. All I have to do is think back twenty
years to my own isolated time of coming-out to know that America is
finally turning a corner. People aren't alone in this anymore.
There's so much more positive reflection of gay people and gay issues in the media. Twenty years
ago, the only time you ever heard about homosexuals in the news was
when it involved a political scandal or AIDS.
The "kids" in their 20s I meet now are already shockingly
different than my peers, who came only half a generation before
them. Being gay is not
the issue with these young'uns: getting a boyfriend is. I guess that's
progress. Oh, and by the way, I am still looking for the right guy too.
So I guess we have
this
shared "adversity" in common. Maybe the New Pride will be born out
of the idea of being bravely single:
"We're queer! Unpaired! Get used to it!"
¨